Document type: Requestor’s Protective Comments under Texas Government Code § 552.304
Requestor: Eric Springstun
TWC Tracking No.: R007894-081226
TWC Civil Rights Case: 06-26-9463-8
Housing Matter: 866363
Purpose of the comments
Eric Springstun submitted written comments to the Texas Attorney General’s Open Records Division concerning TWC’s request for a ruling on records responsive to his August 12, 2026 public-information request.
What records Springstun sought
The request focused on the internal administrative and investigative file: investigator and intake notes, internal communications, supervisory and legal review, communications with HUD, analyses concerning the liveaboard/dwelling question, residency records, jurisdiction and closure analysis, reconsideration materials, and case-management history.
Narrow redactions were not opposed
The protective comments state that Eric Springstun did not seek passwords, authentication credentials, security keys, network architecture, vulnerability information, or other genuinely protected cybersecurity material. The comments likewise did not oppose narrow redaction of private third-party email addresses or other information TWC could demonstrate was confidential under law.
Request for segregable substantive records
The comments asked that confidential fields be redacted narrowly rather than used as a basis to withhold entire substantive records. The focus of the request was how TWC handled, evaluated, and closed the fair-housing matter.
Why this document is favorable transparency evidence
This filing shows that the public-information dispute was not a demand for unrestricted disclosure of private or security-sensitive information. Eric Springstun expressly accepted legally required narrow redactions while seeking the substantive government case-handling record.
That is consistent with the broader approach documented throughout WharfClearLake.com: ask agencies and associations for the underlying records, protect genuinely confidential information, and seek enough disclosure for owners and the public to evaluate how decisions were actually made.
Related pages
From the Marina